Broken seal on a boundary firewall
Nightly check finds seal broken. SA-18 response takes device out of service pending integrity validation.
SA-18 requires implementing anti-tamper technologies and detection for system components where required. Healthcare faces tampered network appliances, compromised biomedical devices, and physical port intrusion on EHR servers — requiring resistance and detection scaled to criticality.
Apply tamper resistance and detection appropriate to critical ePHI components so unauthorized physical or logical tampering is deterred and discovered promptly.
How this control shows up in healthcare and HIPAA-covered environments.
Nightly check finds seal broken. SA-18 response takes device out of service pending integrity validation.
Alert fires when a cover opens in the data center. Investigation confirms authorized maintenance — process validates detection works.
Pump reports tamper. Clinical engineering isolates device per protocol before patient use.
Tamper controls matter when components sit in semi-public clinical spaces or loading paths. Evidence should show detection is live, not decorative seals.
How this NIST control supports HIPAA Security Rule expectations.
Overlapping intent; SR-9 focuses supply-chain tamper resistance/detection. Implement coherently and cross-reference if both exist in your catalog.
Risk-base — prioritize critical infrastructure and high-risk locations over every clinic PC.
Secure boot, code signing, and integrity monitoring (SI-7) complement hardware anti-tamper.
Related controls that commonly accompany SA-18.
Our auditors map NIST SP 800-53 controls to your HIPAA Security Rule program — policies, technical evidence, and audit readiness.